Permalink: https://repository.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu:405773
Collection banner image
Mapping Nazi History: Charting Current Controversies About Hitler’s Regime through Digital Media
Mapping Nazi History: Charting Current Controversies About Hitler’s Regime through Digital Media
This project explores the representations of the Nazi regime in digital media today. By analyzing English Wikipedia pages related to Nazi Germany, we aim to examine this relationship in terms of discovering biases behind editors and editing trends. With the prevalence of digital media and technology in today’s society and information now at everyone’s fingertips, it is important that this information is represented truthfully and with no hint of personal bias or unsupported claims. This project is ongoing as new edits are continuously added and each edit we analyze breaks into different directions of research. Despite the inability to produce conclusive results, the project has already identified trends of Wikipedia editing, the types of editors on the Nazi Germany pages, and some reasons that pages are being changed. For example, we discovered extreme gender disparity among editors—no surprise since estimates suggest that 90% of Wikipedia editors are male. We have also detected cases of cyber bullying committed by men towards female editors, further skewing the perspectives of Wikipedia. In addition, we have encountered a suspected case of unauthorized use of multiple accounts by a single editor, as well as copyright violations that have gone unnoticed for years, on the Nazi-related Wikipedia pages. Our work is holding Wikipedia to its own fair standards in hopes to further present reliable information about the Nazi regime., Keywords: History, Nazi, World War II, Hitler, Wikipedia
Professional Profile of the Physician in Antiquity
Professional Profile of the Physician in Antiquity
This project assembles a single profile of the professional physician in antiquity that reflects the opinions of several ancient Greek and Roman authors. This research clarifies the antique view of medicine and the medical profession, both by examining the consistencies in the profile of the physician and by examining its development over time. The sources examined include 1) Hippocrates, known as the Father of Medicine, to whom the Hippocratic Oath is ascribed; 2) Plato, an ancient Greek philosopher who discusses the physician in his dialogues The Republic and Gorgias; and 3) Galen, the most eminent Roman physician who authored many medical texts. Three methods are used: 1) a dialectical method that examines the definitions the sources present, 2) a diachronic method that orders the definitions historically, and 3) a comparative method that analyzes the similarities between the ancient sources among themselves and against the modern view of the physician. This project finds that the modern profile of the physician, represented by the Modern Hippocratic Oath, was established in antiquity, with specific emphasis on education, theory, practice, and ethics. The only trait that firmly existed in antiquity without parallel in modern day is exclusivity., Keywords: Classics, Ancient philosophy, Plato, Hippocrates, Galen, Physician, Hippocratic Oath, Ancient medicine